Montana applies a two-prong veil-piercing test with 14 factors evaluating alter-ego status. The 2003 Peschel Family Trust v. Colonna decision is the controlling authority. The 2018 In re Atlantis Water Solutions case recognized that traditional corporate-formalities factors are “generally inapplicable” to LLCs — making substantive separateness records the primary defense.
Montana’s Veil-Piercing Standard
Montana applies a two-prong test with 14 factors, established by the Montana Supreme Court in Peschel Family Trust v. Colonna (2003). The first prong requires that the defendant be shown to be an alter ego, instrumentality, or agent of the corporation. The second prong requires substantial evidence that the corporation was used as a subterfuge to defeat public convenience, justify wrong, or perpetrate fraud. The 14 factors generally gauge the shareholder’s control and use of corporate assets, the corporation’s adherence to corporate formalities, separateness from its shareholder, representations to third parties, and capitalization.
The 2018 federal bankruptcy decision in In re Atlantis Water Solutions, LLC recognized that traditional corporate piercing factors do not necessarily apply to LLCs because LLCs are not required to observe the same corporate formalities. The court found that traditional first-prong factors were “generally inapplicable to LLCs” in the form they take for corporations — meaning Montana LLC piercing analysis differs from corporate piercing analysis on procedural-formality questions.
Montana’s framework is moderate. The 14-factor structure is thorough but the “substantial evidence” standard for the second prong sets a meaningful bar — mere control or single ownership is insufficient.
Real Cases from Montana
Peschel Family Trust v. Colonna (Mont., 2003)
14-factor framework established
The Montana Supreme Court established the controlling two-prong test with 14 factors. The first prong requires demonstration of alter-ego, instrumentality, or agent status. The second prong requires substantial evidence that the corporation was used as a subterfuge to defeat public convenience, justify wrong, or perpetrate fraud. The 14 factors generally examine the shareholder’s control and use of corporate assets, formalities, separateness, representations to third parties, and capitalization. Peschel remains the controlling authority in Montana for veil-piercing claims.
What governance records would have changed the outcome: Annual written consents, banking resolutions, distribution authorizations, and single resolutions address the 14 factors by documenting formalities, financial separation, and independent governance. Montana’s 14-factor framework structurally rewards documented governance because each factor has corresponding documentary evidence.
In re Atlantis Water Solutions, LLC (D. Mont. Bankr., 2018)
Veil NOT pierced — LLC-specific framework
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Montana held that traditional corporate piercing factors do not necessarily apply to LLCs. Iofina Resources formed Atlantis as a single-member LLC to develop a water depot in eastern Montana. When Atlantis abandoned the project, the landowner sought to hold Iofina liable under an alter-ego theory. The court found that the traditional first prong was “generally inapplicable to LLCs” because LLCs are not required to observe the same corporate formalities. The court found undercapitalization was insufficient to prove bad faith where: (a) there was no self-dealing; (b) the landowner was paid substantially before cessation; (c) both entities suffered losses; and (d) the landowner knew Atlantis was a start-up. This case is significant for recognizing that LLC piercing requires a different analytical framework than corporate piercing.
What governance records would have changed the outcome: The veil held in this case. Annual written consents documenting the LLC’s independent business purpose and the parent’s non-interference, banking resolutions maintaining separate accounts, and single resolutions documenting legitimate business decisions strengthen the defense against piercing — especially given this court’s recognition that LLC formalities differ from corporate ones.
Flemmer v. Ming (Mont., 1980)
Foundational alter-ego principles
The Montana Supreme Court applied the alter-ego doctrine and examined the standard piercing factors. This case predates the Peschel 14-factor framework but establishes foundational principles of Montana piercing law including the examination of control, formalities, and fraud. Flemmer is frequently cited alongside Gallatin Natural Gas Co. v. Public Service Comm’n (1927) as part of Montana’s long piercing jurisprudence.
What governance records would have changed the outcome: Annual written consents and banking resolutions maintaining separate entity operations are the foundational governance records that defeat alter-ego claims under Montana’s long-established framework.
How to Protect Your LLC in Montana
Montana’s 14-factor framework is structurally well-suited to a documentary defense. Each factor has a corresponding governance document. The Atlantis court’s recognition that LLC formalities differ from corporate formalities is structurally helpful: voluntary governance documentation becomes valuable evidence rather than baseline requirement.
Annual written consents document that the LLC has functioning governance making decisions on a regular cadence — addressing factors related to control, separateness, and operations. Banking resolutions establish that financial authority flows from documented LLC governance. Distribution authorizations record that any money taken from the LLC was authorized through formal channels — addressing factors related to capitalization and asset use. Single resolutions document major decisions in writing.
Without these records, your personal assets are exposed under Montana’s 14-factor analysis. The second-prong “subterfuge” standard requires substantial evidence, but plaintiffs build that case from circumstantial evidence about how the LLC actually operated — making contemporaneous governance records the primary contradicting evidence. Minutes.llc generates the governance documents Montana courts examine, signs them with a digital corporate seal, hashes them, and stores them in a private offshore jurisdiction.
Not sure if your Operating Agreement covers these protections? Check your Operating Agreement for free at CheckMy.llc — it takes 5 minutes and shows you exactly which provisions are missing.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Montana require LLCs to keep meeting minutes?
Montana LLC statutes do not specifically require meeting minutes. The In re Atlantis Water Solutions decision recognized that traditional corporate piercing factors (including formality observance) do not necessarily apply to LLCs because LLCs are not required to observe the same corporate formalities. Voluntary governance documentation remains the most persuasive evidence on the substantive separateness factors that do apply.
What is the standard for veil piercing in Montana?
Montana applies the two-prong Peschel Family Trust v. Colonna (2003) test with 14 factors. The first prong requires the defendant to be shown as an alter ego or instrumentality of the corporation. The second prong requires substantial evidence that the corporation was used as a subterfuge to defeat public convenience, justify wrong, or perpetrate fraud. The 14 factors gauge control, formalities, separateness, third-party representations, and capitalization.
Can a single-member LLC be pierced in Montana?
Yes, but the In re Atlantis Water Solutions case noted that traditional first-prong factors are “generally inapplicable to LLCs” because LLCs do not require the same formalities. Single-member LLCs are subject to piercing for substantive separateness failures — commingling, undercapitalization paired with bad faith, self-dealing — rather than mere formality failures.
What records protect an LLC from veil piercing in Montana?
Annual written consents documenting the LLC’s independent business purpose and the parent’s non-interference, banking resolutions maintaining separate accounts, and single resolutions documenting legitimate business decisions strengthen the defense against piercing. Montana’s 14-factor framework rewards substantive evidence of separateness over procedural formalities.
Does Minutes.llc provide legal advice?
No. Minutes.llc is a document automation platform, not a law firm. The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Veil-piercing outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Consult a licensed Montana attorney for legal questions specific to your situation.
Related reading: All 50 states — veil-piercing guide · The 7 Risks of LLC Veil Piercing · Why Your LLC Needs a Banking Resolution · Governance Glossary
14 Factors Reward 14 Documentary Answers
Montana’s Peschel framework rewards LLCs that can answer each factor with a record. Annual written consent. Banking resolution. Distribution authorization. Single resolution.
Create Your Record →This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The cases described are based on publicly available court opinions and legal analyses. Outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Minutes.llc is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Consult a licensed attorney for legal questions specific to your situation.